Here’s a tricky one; we need to do paging on one of our listing pages. The obvious solution was the following, which is a common pattern:

@Secured(value={Roles.PERSON_READ})
public List<Person> getPeople(int offset, int max) {
   Criteria criteria = getSession().createCriteria(Person.class);
   criteria.setFirstResult(offset;
   criteria.setMaxResults(max);
   return criteria.list();
}

Can you see it? The bug I mean? See it? How about now? Now?

The problem lies in the @Secured annotation. This little guy is SOOOOOO useful for us, but it will burn you once in a while. This annotation will proxy the method and remove any objects which you aren’t allowed to get back. i.e.: It will filter the returned list.

I guess you see it now: If I ask Hibernate to give me rows from 20 to 50, I am in no way garanteed to get back 30 results since Spring will remove items from my list AFTER the query has run and Hibernate has created the list.

The solution? I guess that really depends on your own requirements. Given our own volume and requirements, pulling out all the data on each page request is acceptable (we have a query cache enabled, so it’s not as bad as it may sound).

In other words, you want to test everything around the http call, but don’t care about the call actually being made or not. Yes, yes, yes. I know; just abstract out the call to another class, then mock that … pain in the ass! Use Spring rest template. Pain in the ass and overkill and doesn’t work well in multi threaded setups.

The solution we now use here is called NanoHTTPD which is a tiny, tiny, miniscule http server which can easily run inside a suite of tests. It can easily be extended to intercept calls. For example, we have:

• A HitCountingNanoHTTPD implementation which counts how many times the server was hit (good for testing that a multi-threaded class actually does the amount of call outs you need)
• Another implementation that given a file with key value pairs, will set the response headers using that file.

class HttpHitTest {
     private NanoHTTPD nano;

     @Before
     public void setup() throws Exception {
          nano = new Nano(9999);
     }

     @After
     public void tearDown() throws Exception {
          nano.stop();
     }

     @Test(expected=NoSuchFileException.class)
     public void testHttpHit() {
           HttpGetClass hgc = new HttpGetClass();
           hgc.doGet("http://localhost:9999/resources/myfile.mp3");
      }
}

See the beauty! NanoHTTPD simply exposes all files found in it’s working directory. So all test resources simply go into a folder inside the project and the CI server runs it without a hitch. Bonus: test performance and speeds are not affected (this thing is just so tiny).

As well, here’s what an extension to NanoHTTPD would look like. This example is a very simple something I whipped up to count how many times a server is hit (I needed the counter to be thread safe)

public class HitCountingNanoHttpd extends NanoHTTPD {
	private AtomicLong hits = new AtomicLong(0);

	public HitCountingNanoHttpd(int port) throws IOException {
		super(port);
	}

	@Override
	public Response serve(String uri, String method, Properties header, Properties parms, Properties files) {
		hits.incrementAndGet();
		return super.serve(uri, method, header, parms, files);
	}

	public long getHitCount() {
		return hits.longValue();
	}
}

My assessment just might not be as out of line as some may have thought. Good to get a bit of validation. I may sound like I’m gloating (I sort of am, because honestly some of what happened in the back streets of this story was a bit disgraceful …), but I’m not; I find it really unfortunate. I am still of those that badly wants ActiveMQ to make it.

Edit: Another follow up entry here.